Insurgents push offensive, conducting a string of bombings
KABUL: Voter participation in Afghanistan’s presidential elections appeared yesterday to have been lower than in previous years, with turnout hit by the threat of attacks, a muted campaign and concerns of fraud. Afghans went to the polls Saturday to vote in the first round of a presidential race that will decide whether President Ashraf Ghani will win a second five-year term.
About 9.6 million Afghans in the war-torn nation – with an estimated population of 35 million – had registered to vote in the election, which was held at some 4,900 polling stations. An initial tally released yesterday by Afghanistan’s Independent Election Commission showed that with data from slightly more than half the stations, just under 1.1 million people had voted. If that turnout trend holds, it would represent a participation level of less than 25 percent – lower than any of Afghanistan’s three previous presidential elections.
In 2014, for instance, turnout was a little under 50 percent, although direct comparisons are tough because previous polls were tainted by allegations of systemic fraud. Authorities heralded Saturday’s election as a success because the Taleban were unable to pull off a large-scale attack resulting in high casualty numbers, and there were fewer technical difficulties than some had feared. But the insurgents nonetheless pushed their offensive on the democratic process, conducting a string of bombings at polling stations and engaging Afghan security forces in clashes across the country.
According to the Afghanistan Analysts Network, which compiled incidents through various sources, more than 400 attacks had been reported over the course of the election day. The Taleban claimed to have conducted 531 attacks, while the interior ministry said “the enemy” had carried out 68 assaults. The official death toll is five security forces. But in years past, authorities have suppressed information on election day only to later give larger numbers.
Still, Shaharzad Akbar, who heads the Afghan government’s Independent Human Rights Commission, said she breathed “a sigh of relief” that the election had gone smoothly compared to previous years. “The Afghan security forces really showed a real capability in managing the security situation across Afghanistan in ensuring people have access to polling centers,” she said. But turnout was also hampered by skepticism about the electoral process. Previous polls, including the 2014 presidential election, were undermined by widespread allegations of vote-buying, ballot stuffing and fraud.
And the election campaign itself seemed almost moribund during the two months of campaigning because many thought the poll – already twice delayed while the US and the Taleban tried to negotiate a troop withdrawal deal – would be pushed back yet again. It was only after US President Donald Trump scuppered those talks on September 7 that candidates really believed the election would take place, leaving little time for them to campaign. Turnout was low because of security threats and “the weak campaigning of the candidates” political analyst and Kabul academic Atta Noori said. “It is not because they were not interested to vote,” he said.
Independent political analyst Haroun Mir said that even with a low turnout, the election could be considered a victory for the democratic process because it was “much cleaner” than previous polls. Election officials have said the result would be the purest yet, with equipment such as biometric fingerprint readers and better training for poll workers ensuring the vote was fair. Results are not expected until October 19. Candidates need more than 50 percent of the vote to be declared outright winner, or else the top two will head for a second round in November. – AFP