SAN DIEGO, CA: Business owners and local leaders participate in a rally at the County Administration Building in San Diego, California. Business owners gathered to protest against new COVID-19 regulations as purple tier restrictions take effect. – AFP

WASHINGTON: There’s little doubt that government-ordered business shutdowns to stop the spread of COVID-19 damaged the US economy, but the exact cost has not been clear. Researchers from HEC Paris business school and Bocconi University in Milan have reached a sobering calculation: the closures beginning at the pandemic’s onset in March through May saved 29,000 lives-at a cost of $169 billion, or around $6 million per person.

“Governors saved lives on the one hand, but reduced economic activity on the other,” Jean-Noel Barrot, a professor at HEC Paris and member of France’s National Assembly, told AFP. How to address the world’s largest coronavirus outbreak has become a vexing, politically charged question in the United States, where the virus has infected more than 12.2 million people and killed nearly 257,000.

Virus cases are surging nationwide, prompting many states to again implement restrictions on businesses. But Barrot warns that changes in Americans’ behavior may make renewed business restrictions less effective. “As people become, perhaps, more responsible, as they wear more masks and so on, the effect that we’re seeing on infection is going to probably go down,” he said.

Unprecedented shutdown
The March orders were applied unevenly by state and local governments, but caused unprecedented disruptions to the world’s largest economy, prompting a debate over the government’s role in forcing people to change their lifestyles in the name of public health. Critics have said the restrictions, which were relaxed to varying degrees in the spring and summer, are a costly assault on personal freedom, while supporters say they’re one of the ways the out-of-control virus can be contained.

A June study published in Nature found that without social distancing and business restrictions, the US would have seen cases hit 5.2 million in early April, rather than their actual level of around 365,000. Researchers at Columbia University meanwhile found that more than 35,000 lives could have been saved had such measures been put in place just a week earlier than their mid-March imposition. Though nowhere near as stringent as in other countries where curfews were strictly enforced and rulebreakers penalized, the restrictions’ effects on the US economy were seen almost immediately.

Weekly applications for jobless aid shot up, with nearly 6.9 million filings in the week ended March 28, while the unemployment rate skyrocketed to 14.7 percent in April from its historic low of 3.5 percent in February. Using data from JHU and the US Census Bureau, Barrot determined the various US shutdowns cost about 0.8 percent of total US GDP, but reduced the death toll in the period surveyed by around a quarter.

States’ moves to loosen the restrictions and massive stimulus spending helped the economy heal, pushing the unemployment rate to 6.9 percent in October and weekly jobless aid filings down to around 750,000 — still higher than the worst single week of the 2008-2010 global financial crisis. While Barrot said new blanket restrictions may not be as effective in preventing deaths this time around, but they will certainly remain expensive. “What we need to think of (are) contingency plans to avoid having to, so to speak, burn so much of our collective wealth in order to stay alive,” Barrot said. -AFP